Timeline for Are we, perhaps, voting to close questions a little too enthusiastically due to giving undue weight to certain turns of phrase?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 14, 2017 at 0:01 | comment | added | Нет войне | The stats are interesting! I agree that we (and of course the mods in particular) do pretty well here! This question is just about one small area where I feel there might be an improvement possible (even if that is simply an explanation). | |
| Jan 13, 2017 at 21:28 | history | edited | Doktor MayhemMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 333 characters in body
|
| Jan 13, 2017 at 17:51 | comment | added | Нет войне | IIUC The route back from 'on hold' is in theory slightly easier (as edited on-hold questions go in the reopen queue), but on this site if it's true that there is not much activity around the review queue, is there really much practical difference between 'closed' and 'on hold'? The problem is compounded if the questions seem fine in the first place and it's not clear what edits need to be made. | |
| Jan 13, 2017 at 16:22 | history | answered | Doktor MayhemMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |