Skip to main content
replaced http://music.stackexchange.com/ with https://music.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queuere-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is a list of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two three of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen the question and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is a list of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two three of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen the question and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is a list of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two three of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen the question and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

added 31 characters in body
Source Link
Luke_0
  • 7.5k
  • 12
  • 15

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is alista list of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only twotwo three of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen the question and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is alist of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is a list of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two three of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen the question and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).

Source Link
Luke_0
  • 7.5k
  • 12
  • 15

Well, as you may know, there is a re-open review queue. All questions that have any re-open votes on them will be sent to the queue and those with enough rep can review whether or not they should be re-opened.

The second way is via the moderator tools (available to all 2K+users). In there is alist of the questions with the most recent reopen votes and the questions with the most reopen votes.

With these two tools, mods and high-rep users can see these questions and either vote to reopen or let it stay closed.


As to your specific example, I saw it in the re-open queue and have voted to re-open it. However, only two of our 98 eligible users have ever used that queue, which is a dilemma. It is a known problem that it is hard to reopen a question, but that might be "status by design". My guess is that the mods have seen and think it is still to ambiguous.


Note, it is fine to request a question be reopened here on meta. That's what meta is for. If you wish to discuss this specific question further, rather than reopening in general, either make a new question or edit this one to clarify. There's nothing wrong with asking for a specific question to be reopened on meta (although the request may be declined).