Timeline for Should we add the instrument name to the title if a tag exists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://music.stackexchange.com/ with https://music.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.music.stackexchange.com/ with https://music.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 15, 2013 at 5:46 | comment | added | dumbledad | "Needed" may be too strong but yes, for me a tag is somehow weaker than a title. In this case I think both would have been useful since the question is specifically about mandolin playing. The question on this meta-site with the most up-votes contains "music notation" in the title and the tags, and looking on the main site at the most up-voted questions shows they duplicate tags in the titles, albeit (as luser droog says) fitted naturally in. | |
| May 15, 2013 at 1:48 | comment | added | DQdlM |
Thanks for your thoughts on this. Do you think that the name in the title is needed given that the question was already tagged mandolin?
|
|
| May 14, 2013 at 20:53 | history | answered | dumbledad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |