Today there was this question: Which scales are used by Tom Morello?

I really like this question, but I have a feeling that this wouldn't really be of any help to future readers.

So is this question off topic?


I do think the question is on topic. It often lies in a musical performers interest to incorporate other players styles in his/hers playing. Getting knowledgeable people to discuss or analyze that player's style is helpful, and if the player is known enough there will be general interest. As the answer to the question shows, I think it is clear that interesting things has already been obtained from this question.

I think we should give questions the benefit of the doubt in general, since we are not drowning in questions. Some questions are clearly of limited use, but I feel there is a tendency to be too worried about what's on topic, rather than gaining momentum and avoiding scaring people off. (I myself has been guilty of this...)


I think Morello is influential enough and innovative enough to study, although the specific question asked might be too limited in scope. But then the first answer given to it suggests that even the limited scope of Morello's scale and chord choices may be interesting to performers and composers.

Thus, while I can easily imagine poor questions of this nature, I don't think this question is a poor one, and I've upvoted it. (That said, I think it would be an even better question if it focused on what Morello’s choices accomplish, or why he made them, rather than simply which scales they are.)


I lean towards it being off-topic. I don't see much to distinguish it from any other identification question. And the answer is probably "a whole freakin' lot".

You could argue that Morello is popular enough for the question to have some use to visitors, but I would argue back that it is essentially static, uneducational information. As a site for musicians and not listeners, we want to help people improve their musical skills. Asking how to identify scales fits this model; asking someone else to do it for you does not.

  • FWIW, on balance I agree with your thoughts, Matthew. I realised, reading the Morello question, that there is no way to give a definitive answer. I thought it might be useful to take the OP through the process of how one might listen analytically to this kind of material. Whether the answer is used this way, I can't say... I'm still quite new to music.se, is the wiki system still in use? And if so, would that be a better fit for sharing this kind of information? – Bob Broadley Apr 24 '14 at 21:45
  • @BobBroadley Based on the recent blog post about Community Wiki, it sounds like that feature has never quite gotten its feet on the SE network. – Bradd Szonye Apr 24 '14 at 22:22
  • Right! I must confess I had a little look at that yesterday, but wasn't really sure about how it worked... – Bob Broadley Apr 24 '14 at 22:24
  • Personally I think the attitude towards "identification questions" has been stiflingly anal. In particular, I feel the assumption that identification is categorically not useful to other users is flawed. I put up a meta question about that here: meta.music.stackexchange.com/questions/731/… – Roland Bouman Apr 26 '14 at 21:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .