7

We all know the site is graduating soon and one nice thing to do before we are fully graduated is to clean up the tags on the main site. We have almost 300 tags and tags are very important to organizing questions asked and making sure people who are interested in a topic can find questions and answers easily.

We should all make sure that:

  • Duplicate tags are made synonyms.
  • Useless tags are removed.
  • Tag Wikis are not missing (Good chance for users under 1k rep to get a little rep).
  • Tags are applied where they need to be applied.

Post below if you think any tags that need cleaning (dupes, mistakes, unneeded, blacklisting etc) and we'll decide as a community what to do.


Current pending synonyms:

Removed Tags:

4

10 Answers 10

12

I believe the <- synonym request should be declined, and instead:

<-

Reference: oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/pedagogy

1
  • 2
    status-completed
    – user28
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:42
10

The tag should be removed because it doesn't really give any information about what the question is about. Of the 3 questions it is tagged in, 1 is closed and the other two are about completely different topics. One is about alternate solfege and is about if a cajon can be an alternate drum set.

1
  • 1
    status-completed
    – user28
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:33
10

On the issue that Charles raised, I propose that as a tag itself is scrapped.

Lots of the questions should be retagged .

Those questions referring to piano or harp pedals, I think the tag could just be removed - I'm not sure it's possible to be an expert only in playing the piano with a pedal, and not in general.

and should be kept separate - effects pedals are not only used for guitars (I'm thinking loopers), and it's possible to also create guitar effects without the use of a pedal. (I believe, not my area!)

13
  • 2
    Sounds good to me. Also there are guitar effects that aren't pedals, so your solution makes sense.
    – charlie
    Commented Oct 17, 2014 at 12:08
  • There is another concept with pedal in the name: pedal point. Don't think there's many questions about that, and agree on "effects-pedal". Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 15:05
  • Hmm...can you be an expert in pedal notes? (Which according to google is another name for 'pedal point'!)
    – Chris
    Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 15:07
  • For guitar-effects, I'm not seeing many in guitar-specific non-electronic effects, such as harp harmonics, above-the-nut bends, pinch harmonics and the like. If I asked about dive-bombing with a Floyd Rose or string bending to emulate a pedal steel, those would be guitar effects, but any instrument with an electronic output can be plugged into a delay or overdrive pedal. The other world fit under guitar-technique or something Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 15:11
  • @VarLogRant - I'm confused, are you suggesting that guitar-effects should also be merged into something? There doesn't currently seem to be a guitar-technique tag - are you suggesting there's a better current tag these should be merged into?
    – Chris
    Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 16:08
  • @Chris - Sorry about the confusion. I think that everything I see in the guitar-effects tag should be tagged with effects-pedal instead. I gave examples of things that could be "guitar effects", and think they should have another tag instead. Maybe "guitar", "electric guitar" or "acoustic guitar". Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 19:21
  • It is true that there's also onboard effects and rackmount effects, but I don't think breaking that out of effects-pedal is worth it. Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 19:25
  • @VarLogRant hmm, ok, not my area of expertise at all, I'll admit!
    – Chris
    Commented Oct 18, 2014 at 19:29
  • 1
    @VarLogRant I'd propose merging effects-pedal into guitar-effects since the latter more general, I don't see an advantage to going the other way. Chris, I think your argument about piano pedalling being a subset of piano is not a good reason to remove pedals, since the same logic could be applied to removing effects-pedal/guitar-effects. A rename would be better.
    – user28
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:39
  • @Matthew - Effects-pedals (loopers) can be used for many instruments, not just guitars - I wouldn't agree with that merge.
    – Chris
    Commented Nov 26, 2014 at 13:03
  • @Matt: I stand by my original post on pedals. Piano pedals work in a simple way and make a limited number of changes to the sound - I don't believe there's enough questions to justify a separate piano-pedals tag. guitar attracts way more questions, and there are way more possibilities under the 'guitar-effects' banner, and thus more questions which could be asked. I would also imagine that guitar-effects questions are a subset some guitarists may wish to only follow, and others may wish to filter out (classical players?) - whereas piano pedals are a more staple part of playing piano.
    – Chris
    Commented Nov 26, 2014 at 13:09
  • I think my point is: piano's come with pedals as standard. Guitar-pedals are an added extra the player may or may not use
    – Chris
    Commented Nov 26, 2014 at 13:26
  • Questions about piano pedal usage are helpful for newbies. I’d recommend keeping that usage but renaming it to something like keyboard-pedals. As for guitar-effects and effects-pedal, while I can see a difference between the two, there is also a vast overlap, and in practice I always end up tagging with both, or choosing one arbitrarily, when I want to ask a question about effects.
    – B. Szonye
    Commented Dec 23, 2014 at 21:02
7

<- should be a synonymy because they both are typically used to talk about keys and are typically used interchangeably. Even if the questions that talk specifically about the key signature the key signature is part of the key.

4
  • I'm not totally agreed with this. For those that want to learn specifically about key signatures, the tag is a useful category.
    – user28
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:41
  • @MatthewRead I would tend to agree, but as the current tagging stands they are used interchangeably. If you check questions tagged key-signatures most of them are about keys themselves not the key signature.
    – Dom Mod
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:48
  • Hmmm - just re-reading this. Should we maybe keep these 2 tags, but edit them so they are used correctly?
    – Doktor Mayhem Mod
    Commented Jul 16, 2015 at 13:42
  • @DrMayhem That's a possibility. I think the trickier thing would be getting people to understand when you should use one or the other (or both). I just did a quick check and there are at least 20 questions that need to be retagged to either be switched to the other one or add the other one.
    – Dom Mod
    Commented Jul 16, 2015 at 16:42
6

I just found -- should be merged with .

4

With the current effects and pedal tags, it’s extremely difficult to choose a reasonable set of tags for guitar effects pedals. I usually end up choosing arbitrarily between and , and clearly many other people simply choose . That’s a mess – there is so much overlap between these things that we should not have 3+ separate tags for them.

The tag should be split into its main uses:

We should make a synonym of and then retag anything that is not actually about guitar effects, like . Once the tag has all non-guitar questions removed from it, we can also make that a synonym of the most common “pedal” type questions, probably .

6
  • 1
    Since this fills-out the details of Chris's popular answer, I went ahead edited the tag wiki to read "Do not use" with your list of alternatives. And have started re-tagging questions when I have the energy. Commented Dec 29, 2014 at 5:22
  • What about organ-pedals? It is significantly different from keyboard-pedals.
    – yo'
    Commented Dec 29, 2014 at 10:31
  • True, they are only superficially similar. Depends on whether we actually have any questions about them that people care enough about to separate piano and organ pedals. (Also note that guitar pedals are largely more similar in form than actual musical function, but we keep them together.)
    – B. Szonye
    Commented Dec 29, 2014 at 21:21
  • So, the other day I asked a question about putting Velcro on guitar pedals, where I actually wanted a pedals tag to indicate that I'm talking about the physical hardware and not its function. Not sure whether it actually changes my answer here but it's something to think about.
    – B. Szonye
    Commented Jan 1, 2015 at 20:54
  • I don't think we should have a tag for pedal-points as we don't have any tags in general for non-harmonic tones.
    – Dom Mod
    Commented Jan 7, 2015 at 13:46
  • @Dom That’s just my suggested name if there are any posts actually tagged for that reason. We needn’t create it if there is no use for it.
    – B. Szonye
    Commented Jan 8, 2015 at 2:47
3

The tag should be removed for a few reasons.

First of all it is unclear what the subject is as there are diminished chord, intervals, scales, and diminished could even apply to rhythms (technically a diminution, but the same root word). Another tag would be needed to make it clear what you were talking about and then the diminished tag would be unnecessary because it is a subset of that topic.

Secondly, we do not have and tags and they are the more prevalent scales, chords, intervals, ect in music and I consider the fact that we don't have or need those tags that we don't need a diminished tag.

1
  • 1
    status-completed
    – user28
    Commented Nov 25, 2014 at 22:34
3

Found and -- these are overkill given the existing .

1
  • 0 questions tagged for each, so they should be safe to remove... Commented Jan 14, 2015 at 11:12
2

should be dropped: only two questions, one about didgeridoo (an overtone instrument) and one about the difference between harmonics and overtones. Since already exists for (essentially) all questions related to overtones, we can safely drop it.

1
  • 1
    Perhaps make overtones a synonym of harmonics?
    – B. Szonye
    Commented Dec 23, 2014 at 21:00
0

The tag should be removed as any question that talks about tetrachords would be talking about scales and how they are made which we already have a tag for.

1
  • I don't disagree, but as words go, that one's pretty double-plus good. Commented Jan 21, 2015 at 6:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .